Are Proof of Stake Networks Also Vulnerable to Majority Attacks?

Yes, Proof of Stake (PoS) networks are vulnerable to majority attacks, but they manifest differently than in PoW. In PoS, an attacker would need to acquire a majority of the network's staked cryptocurrency, which could be 51% or in some cases as low as 34%, to control validation.

However, acquiring such a large stake would be incredibly expensive, and the attacker's own holdings would be at risk of being "slashed" (destroyed) as a penalty for malicious behavior. This economic disincentive is the primary defense against such attacks.

Compare and Contrast the Security Implications of Proof-of-Work (PoW) versus Proof-of-Stake (PoS)
Can a Double-Spend Attack Occur on a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) Network?
What Is the “51% Attack” and How Does It Differ in PoW versus PoS Systems?
Compare the Capital Cost of a PoS Attack to the Energy Cost of a PoW Attack
Can a 51% Attack Occur on a PoS Network, and How Would It Differ from a PoW Attack?
Why Is a PoS Attack Considered Self-Destructing?
Is It Possible for a Single Entity to Control the Majority of Staked Assets in a Large PoS Network?
How Does a 51% Attack Differ between PoW and PoS Systems?

Glossar