Are There AMM Formulas Other than X Y = K Designed to Minimize Impermanent Loss?

Yes, there are alternative AMM designs. For instance, stable-swap AMMs use a formula that behaves like a constant sum (x + y = k) near the peg, offering very low slippage and minimal impermanent loss for assets that are expected to trade near parity, like stablecoins.

Other models, such as concentrated liquidity, allow LPs to allocate capital within a specific price range, which can increase capital efficiency but may increase impermanent loss outside that range.

What Is the Trade-off between Capital Efficiency and Impermanent Loss Risk in Concentrated Liquidity?
What Is the Difference between a Constant Product Market Maker and a Stable Swap Market Maker?
How Do Single-Sided Staking and Concentrated Liquidity Pools Attempt to Mitigate Impermanent Loss?
Can a Concentrated Liquidity AMM Model Completely Eliminate Impermanent Loss?
How Does a Concentrated Liquidity Pool Differ in Its Impact on Impermanent Loss?
How Does the Fee Structure in Concentrated Liquidity Pools Compensate for the Increased Risk of Impermanent Loss?
How Do Concentrated Liquidity Pools Modify the Constant Product Formula’s Impact?
Explain the Difference between a Constant Product and a Stable-Swap AMM

Glossar