Are There Scenarios Where the Checks-Effects-Interactions Pattern Is Insufficient?

Yes, the Checks-Effects-Interactions pattern can be insufficient in cases of cross-function reentrancy. If two different functions share the same state and one of them allows an external call before updating that state, an attacker can exploit the first function to manipulate the state used by the second.

Additionally, in complex systems with multiple interacting contracts, this pattern alone might not be enough to prevent all reentrancy-related vulnerabilities. A holistic security approach, including reentrancy guards and thorough audits, is often necessary.

How Can Reentrancy Attacks Be Prevented in Smart Contracts?
Provide a Simple Code Example of a Function Following the CEI Pattern
What Are the Differences between Single-Function and Cross-Function Reentrancy Attacks?
How Can a Flash Loan Attack Exploit a Vulnerable Oracle Used by an Options Protocol?
Why Is Updating State before an External Call the Critical Part of the CEI Pattern?
Can a Fork Lead to Security Vulnerabilities in a Cryptocurrency Network?
What Is the Preventative Measure Called Checks-Effects-Interactions?
How Do Decentralized Exchanges (DEXs) Differ from Centralized Exchanges in Their Vulnerability to State-Sponsored Attacks?