Can a Depleted Insurance Fund Lead to a Loss of Collateral for Non-Bankrupt Traders?

Yes, a fully depleted insurance fund can lead to a loss of collateral for non-bankrupt traders, specifically if the exchange is forced to implement a socialized loss system. In this scenario, the remaining deficit is covered by deducting a proportional amount from the unrealized profits or, in the worst case, the collateral of all profitable traders.

This is why ADL is preferred, as it is a targeted closure, not a system-wide deduction.

What Is the Alternative to Socialized Losses Used by Some Derivatives Exchanges?
What Is the Difference between “Auto-Deleveraging” and Using an Insurance Fund?
How Does ADL Differ from a Socialized Loss System?
What Is “Auto-Deleveraging” (ADL) and How Does It Compare to Socialized Loss?
What Is the Exchange’s Last Resort If Both the Insurance Fund and ADL Fail?
Define “Socialized Losses” and How They Impact Profitable Traders
How Does an “Insurance Fund” Function as a Loss-Absorption Layer on a Crypto Derivatives Exchange?
What Are ‘Socialized Losses’ and How Do They Differ from Insurance Fund Coverage?

Glossar