Can a Double-Spend Attack Occur without a 51 Percent Attack? ⎊ Path

Can a Double-Spend Attack Occur without a 51 Percent Attack?

Yes, a double-spend attack can occur without controlling 51 percent of the hashrate, though these methods are generally less reliable and harder to execute. Examples include the "race attack" and the "Finney attack." A race attack involves broadcasting two conflicting transactions simultaneously to different nodes, hoping one confirms before the other.

A Finney attack involves a miner pre-mining a block with a transaction that is then reversed on the public chain. However, a 51 percent attack is the most powerful and reliable method for a large-scale, sustained double-spend.

Can a Double-Spend Attack Occur on a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) Network?

How Does a Race Attack Attempt to Double-Spend Cryptocurrency?

How Does the Cost of a 51 Percent Attack Influence the Required Profit from a Double-Spend?

Do Proof-of-Stake (PoS) Systems Face an Equivalent to a 51 Percent Attack?

What Are the Specific Statistical Methods Used to Identify Anomalous Data in Real-Time?

What Is the Difference between a 51 Percent Attack and a Double-Spending Attempt?

Is Time-Stamping on a Blockchain Inherently More Reliable than on a CEX?

In High-Frequency Trading (HFT), Why Is VWAP Sometimes a Less Reliable Benchmark than TWAP?