Can a Governance Token Also Be Classified as a Utility Token?

Yes, a token can function as both a governance token and a utility token. Many tokens are designed to provide access to a service (utility) while also granting the holder the right to vote on the protocol's future (governance).

For instance, a token might be used to pay transaction fees (utility) and also allow voting on the fee structure (governance). The regulatory challenge arises when the primary value proposition is the expectation of profit from the governance/management team's efforts, which could push it toward a security classification despite the presence of utility.

What Is the Primary Distinction between a Utility Token and a Security Token?
How Do Governance Tokens Differ from Utility Tokens in the Context of a DAO’s Treasury Management?
What Is the Concept of a ‘Governance Token’ and Its Legal Standing?
What Is the Difference between a Utility Token and a Security Token in Cryptocurrency?
What Is the Primary Driver of an Option’s Extrinsic Value besides Time?
How Do “Utility Tokens” Aim to Avoid Being Classified as Securities?
Does the Regulatory Classification of the Asset Affect the Remaining Counterparty Risk?
What Is the Difference between a ‘Utility Token’ and a ‘Security Token’ in the Context of ICOs?

Glossar