Skip to main content

Can a Token Be Both a Fee-Sharing and a Utility Token Simultaneously?

Yes, a token can be designed to be both. For instance, a token might be required to pay for transaction fees (utility) while also granting the holder a right to a portion of the protocol's surplus revenue (fee-sharing).

This hybrid design aims to capture value from both consumption demand and investment demand. However, the fee-sharing aspect significantly increases the regulatory risk of being classified as a security, requiring careful structuring.

How Does a Layer-Two Scaling Solution Impact the Transaction Fee Revenue of Layer-One Miners?
What Is a ‘MEV-Share’ Protocol and How Does It Redistribute MEV?
Are There Hybrid Legal Agreements That Combine Smart Contracts with Traditional Law?
What Is the Difference between a Fee-Sharing Token and a Simple Utility Token in a DCF Context?