Can a Truly Decentralized Stablecoin Comply with AML/KYC Regulations?

Full compliance is challenging for truly decentralized stablecoins because they lack a central authority to enforce KYC/AML checks on users. Regulations typically require an identifiable entity responsible for monitoring transactions and reporting suspicious activity.

Some stablecoins employ "hybrid" models with on-ramps/off-ramps that are centralized and perform checks, but the core protocol remains permissionless. The regulatory landscape is evolving, with some proposals suggesting that decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) or protocol developers could be held accountable, though this is legally complex.

How Does the Need for Decentralization Conflict with Corporate Governance Structures?
How Do AML and KYC Regulations Apply to Decentralized Assets like Bitcoin?
How Do KYC and AML Regulations Impact User Privacy on Custodial Exchanges?
How Do KYC and AML Regulations for Crypto Vary across Different Jurisdictions?
How Does the Oversight Committee Handle Conflicts of Interest among Its Members?
How Does the Collateralization Mechanism of Stablecoins like DAI Differ from Centralized Ones like USDC?
What Role Do Oracles Play in the Function and Security of Decentralized Stablecoins?
How Have Some Exchanges Responded to Regulatory Pressure on Privacy Coins?

Glossar