Can a Validator in a PoS System Execute a Successful Double-Spend without a Majority Stake?

No, a single validator cannot successfully execute a double-spend. While they can propose a block that contains a conflicting transaction, the network's consensus mechanism requires a supermajority of validators to attest to and finalize a block.

Without the majority stake, their malicious block will be rejected, and they risk being slashed for proposing an invalid or conflicting block.

If a PoW Miner Creates a Blank Block, What Prevents Them from Being the PoS Validator?
How Does the ‘Supermajority’ Concept Work in PoS Finality?
How Do Proof-of-Stake (PoS) Systems Achieve Economic Finality Differently than PoW Systems?
How Does a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) Consensus Mechanism Change the Nature of MEV Compared to Proof-of-Work (PoW)?
What Regulatory Frameworks Are Being Developed to Address the Risks of Perpetual Futures?
Does Proof-of-Stake (PoS) Achieve Finality Differently than PoW?
How Does a Validator’s Stake Act as a Security Bond in a PoS System?
How Does the Mempool Relate to a Double-Spend Attempt?

Glossar