Can Increasing Transaction Fees Deter a 51% Attack?

Increasing transaction fees alone is not a direct deterrent to a 51% attack. The attacker's goal is to execute a double-spend to steal funds, not to profit from mining fees.

While higher fees make mining more profitable, potentially attracting more honest miners, this effect is often too slow to counter a sudden, massive influx of rented hashrate. The attacker's cost is the hashrate rental fee, which is largely independent of the transaction fees.

Are Hashrate Rental Contracts a Type of Financial Derivative?
What Is the Primary Difference between Hashrate Rental and Traditional Mining Pools?
Does the Cost of a 51% Attack Change Based on the Coin’s Market Capitalization?
How Do Hashrate Rental Markets Impact the Economic Security Model of Proof-of-Work (PoW) Coins?
What Is the Risk to the Renter in a Hashrate Rental Agreement?
How Does Hashrate Rental Act as a Form of Financial Hedging for a Miner?
How Do Major Hashrate Rental Platforms like NiceHash Contribute to the Attack Cost Calculation?
How Does the Cost of a 51% Attack Relate to a Coin’s Total Network Hashrate?

Glossar