Skip to main content

Can the Overhead Be Amortized across Multiple Financial Transactions?

Yes, the computational overhead of proof generation is amortized in batching systems like ZK-Rollups. A single, complex proof is generated to validate a large batch of hundreds or thousands of transactions.

The high cost of generating that one proof is then divided among all the transactions in the batch, resulting in a very low cost per individual transaction.

What Is the Trade-off in Computational Complexity between the Two Rollup Types?
How Does the Overhead of Proof Generation Impact Transaction Fees?
What Is the Impact of Transaction Batching on Merkle Tree Efficiency?
What Is the Difference between a ZK-Rollup and an Optimistic Rollup?