Can Vesting Schedules Be Modeled Using Black-Scholes Principles?

While the Black-Scholes model is primarily for pricing European-style options on non-dividend-paying stocks, its principles (volatility, time, interest rates) can conceptually inform the valuation of unvested tokens, especially those resembling employee stock options. However, the unique illiquidity, governance rights, and non-standard vesting/cliff structures of crypto tokens require significant modification to the standard model.

How Does the ‘Black-Scholes’ Model Adapt to the Unique Characteristics of Crypto Options?
How Does a Token Standard like ERC-20 Fundamentally Differ from an NFT Standard like ERC-721?
How Does the Black-Scholes Model Account for Market Liquidity in Option Pricing?
How Do Vesting Schedules Affect the Circulating Supply and Short-Term Price?
How Does the Legal Concept of a “Simple Agreement for Future Tokens” (SAFT) Relate to Vesting Schedules?
How Can a Decreasing Token Supply Be Modeled in a Multi-Period QTM Valuation?
How Do Governance ‘Epochs’ or ‘Seasons’ Relate to Token Vesting Schedules?
How Do Vesting Schedules for Team Tokens Compare to Those for Early Investors?

Glossar