Compare and Contrast the Security Implications of Proof-of-Work (PoW) versus Proof-of-Stake (PoS).

PoW relies on miners expending computational power to secure the network, making a 51% attack expensive due to hardware and energy costs. PoS relies on validators staking their tokens, making a 51% attack expensive due to the cost of acquiring and risking a majority of the staked tokens.

PoS is generally more energy-efficient, but PoW has a longer, proven security history.

What Is the ‘Nothing at Stake’ Problem Unique to Proof-of-Stake?
How Does a Hybrid PoW/PoS System Compare to a Multi-Algorithm PoW System in Terms of Security?
What Is the Difference between Proof-of-Work (PoW) and Proof-of-Stake (PoS)?
Can a PoS Attacker Easily Acquire 51% of the Staked Tokens on a Large Network?
How Does the ‘Halving’ Event in PoW Networks Affect the Security Budget?
How Does Proof-of-Stake (PoS) Differ from Proof-of-Work (PoW)?
What Is the Difference between Proof-of-Work and Proof-of-Stake?
What Are the Primary Differences between Proof of Work (PoW) and Proof of Stake (PoS) Consensus Mechanisms?

Glossar