Compare the Capital Efficiency of Fiat-Backed Vs. Over-Collateralized Stablecoins.

Fiat-backed stablecoins are considered highly capital efficient because they operate on a near 1:1 collateralization ratio (e.g. $1 fiat for 1 stablecoin).

This means almost all deposited capital is used to back the stablecoin supply. Over-collateralized stablecoins are significantly less capital efficient, as they require a substantial excess buffer (e.g.

$150 crypto for $100 stablecoin) to account for collateral volatility. This trade-off reflects the difference between a centralized, low-volatility backing and a decentralized, high-volatility backing.

What Is the Difference between a ‘Fiat-Backed’ and an ‘Algorithmic’ Stablecoin?
How Do Fiat-Backed Stablecoins Prove They Have the Reserves to Back Their Value?
How Does the Risk Profile of an Algorithmic Stablecoin Compare to a Fiat-Backed Stablecoin?
How Do Crypto-Backed Stablecoins Differ from Fiat-Backed Stablecoins in Terms of Reserve Management?
How Does an Algorithmic Stablecoin Differ from a Fiat-Backed Stablecoin in Terms of Reserve Risk?
How Does Over-Collateralization in Crypto-Backed Stablecoins Differ from Fiat-Backed Reserves?
What Are the Three Main Types of Stablecoins (Fiat-Backed, Crypto-Backed, Algorithmic)?
What Are “Gas Fees” and How Can an Inefficient PoC Design Impact Them in the MVP?

Glossar