Does a Flash Loan Exploit Directly Cause or Simply Leverage Existing Impermanent Loss?

A flash loan exploit does not directly cause impermanent loss, but it leverages the existing vulnerability created by the AMM's pricing mechanism and the resulting price divergence. Flash loans allow an attacker to borrow a large amount of capital, execute a massive swap to manipulate the pool's price, and then execute another action (like liquidating a vault or exploiting another protocol) before repaying the loan in the same transaction.

The large, rapid price change caused by the flash loan's swap maximizes the impermanent loss for the LPs during that brief moment, which is a side effect of the price manipulation, not the primary goal.

How Does a Flash Loan Attack Exploit a Simple Spot Price Oracle?
What Is “Impermanent Loss” in the Context of an AMM Liquidity Pool?
How Does an NFT-backed Loan Compare to a Traditional Margin Loan on a Security?
What Is a ‘Flash Loan Attack’ and How Does It Exploit DEX Protocols?
What Is the Concept of Impermanent Loss in Liquidity Provision?
What Mechanism Prevents a Flash Loan from Being Exploited in a High-Liquidity Centralized Exchange Environment?
What Is a “Flash Loan” and How Is It Used in Conjunction with Oracle Manipulation?
What Is a “Flash Loan” and How Does It Leverage DeFi Composability?

Glossar