Does a Higher Staking Requirement for Validators Reduce MEV Risk?

A higher staking requirement may reduce the number of individual validators, potentially increasing centralization, but it does not inherently reduce MEV risk. The core problem is the block proposer's control over transaction ordering.

While a larger stake means a validator has more to lose if they are caught acting maliciously (via slashing), the increased potential MEV revenue may still outweigh the risk, especially if the malicious behavior is hard to prove.

Explain the Difference between MEV in Proof-of-Work (PoW) and Proof-of-Stake (PoS) Consensus Mechanisms
What Is the Potential Impact of “Maximal Extractable Value” (MEV) on Transaction Ordering?
Does Transaction Batching Eliminate MEV Entirely?
How Do Batch Auctions Eliminate the Transaction Ordering Advantage?
How Do Different Consensus Mechanisms (E.g. PoS Vs. PoW) Influence Transaction Ordering Manipulation?
How Does MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) Relate to Arbitrage in DEX Pools?
Does the PoA Model Fully Eliminate the ‘Nothing-at-Stake’ Problem?
How Do MEV-resistant Protocols Attempt to Solve the Transaction Reordering Problem?

Glossar