Does a Market Maker Prefer a Stable or Volatile Funding Rate for Hedging?

A market maker generally prefers a stable funding rate for hedging. A stable rate allows for predictable hedge costs and easier risk management.

A volatile funding rate introduces uncertainty and can quickly turn a profitable hedge into a costly one, adding a layer of funding risk to the overall inventory management.

Why Might a Market Maker Intentionally Target a Lower Fill Rate in a Highly Volatile Crypto Options Market?
Can an Interest Rate Swap Be Used to Hedge against Falling Interest Rates?
Why Might a Business Prefer a Forward Contract over a Futures Contract?
What Is the Relationship between Perpetual Futures Funding Rates and a “Flight to Quality”?
How Does a Non-Turing-Complete Language Enhance the Security of Smart Contracts?
Which Type of Rug Pull Is Easier to Prosecute Legally?
How Does a Miner’s Time Horizon Influence Their Choice of a Reward System?
How Does a Fixed versus Variable Staking Reward Rate Impact Supply Predictability?

Glossar