Does a Stablecoin-to-Stablecoin Pool Eliminate Impermanent Loss?

A stablecoin-to-stablecoin pool, like USDC/DAI, significantly minimizes impermanent loss but does not completely eliminate it. Impermanent loss is caused by price divergence.

Since stablecoins are pegged to the same value (usually 1 USD), their ratio should remain near 1:1. However, if one stablecoin de-pegs, even slightly, impermanent loss will occur, albeit typically much smaller than in volatile asset pairs.

Does a Return of the Token Prices to Their Original Ratio Eliminate the Impermanent Loss?
Why Are “Stableswaps” or Similar Curves Used for Stablecoin Pools Instead of X Y = K?
What Is the Difference between a “Soft-Peg” and a “Hard-Peg” and Its Impact on Collateral Risk?
What Are the Specific Mechanisms an Algorithmic Stablecoin Uses to Maintain Its Peg?
How Is Impermanent Loss Minimized in a Stablecoin-Only Liquidity Pool?
What Are the Differences between Asset-Backed and Algorithmic Stablecoins?
What Are the Different Mechanisms Used to Maintain a Stablecoin’s Peg?
How Do ‘Stablecoins’ Reduce Impermanent Loss?

Glossar