Skip to main content

Does PoA Fully Eliminate the Risk of a Sybil Attack?

PoA significantly mitigates the risk of a Sybil attack but does not fully eliminate it. A Sybil attack involves one entity creating many identities to gain disproportionate influence.

In PoA, the PoW phase requires real computational power, and the PoS phase requires real staked capital. Both mechanisms impose a high barrier to entry, making it uneconomical for a single attacker to gain a majority share through fake identities.

How Does a Consensus Mechanism like PoA Aim to Prevent Malicious Forks?
How Does a Hybrid PoW/PoS System Compare to a Multi-Algorithm PoW System in Terms of Security?
Are Proof of Stake Systems More Vulnerable to Sybil Attacks than Proof of Work Systems?
Does Proxy Hedging Fully Eliminate the Need for Delta Hedging on the Underlying Asset?