Does the Anonymity of a CLOB Increase or Decrease Concerns about Counterparty Risk?

The anonymity of a CLOB decreases immediate concerns about counterparty risk for the trader, but only because that risk has been transferred to a central clearing house (CCP). Traders do not need to know or trust who is on the other side of their trade because the CCP guarantees settlement.

Therefore, the anonymity is a feature enabled by the CCP's risk management. However, it concentrates systemic risk onto the clearinghouse itself.

If the CCP were to fail, the entire market would be exposed, a far greater risk than any single counterparty default.

What Is the Primary Difference between an RFQ Platform and a Central Limit Order Book (CLOB) for Options Trading?
What Is Novation in the Context of a Clearinghouse?
How Does the Lack of a Central Intermediary in a DEX Complicate the Enforcement of Anti-Front-Running Rules?
What Is the Risk of “Legging Out” a Complex Options Trade on a CLOB?
How Does an RFQ Platform Differ from a Central Limit Order Book (CLOB)?
Explain the Difference between an RFQ Platform and a Central Limit Order Book (CLOB)
In Which Specific Cryptocurrency Sectors Is Anonymity More Common or Accepted?
What Are the Trade-Offs between Anonymity and Accountability in DAO Governance?

Glossar