Does the Capital Efficiency of a Stablecoin Pool Increase or Decrease the Risk of Impermanent Loss?

Increased capital efficiency in stablecoin pools (like those using stableswap curves) means that a smaller amount of liquidity can handle a larger trading volume with low slippage. This efficiency is achieved by concentrating liquidity near the peg.

However, this also means that if a de-peg does occur, the concentrated liquidity will be drained much faster by arbitrageurs, potentially increasing the speed and severity of the resulting impermanent loss.

How Does Capital Efficiency Differ between a Standard AMM and a Concentrated Liquidity Pool?
What Is the Role of a Stability Mechanism like an Automated Market Maker (AMM) during a De-Peg Event?
How Do Different AMM Formulas, like Constant Sum, Affect the Severity of Impermanent Loss?
What Is the Role of Arbitrageurs in Maintaining the Peg of Both Fiat-Backed and Algorithmic Stablecoins?
Why Is the Constant Sum Model Susceptible to Being Fully Drained When the Price Peg Fails?
What Metric Do Traders Use to Quantify the Severity of a Flash Crash’s Impact?
How Does a Concentrated Liquidity Pool Differ in Its Impact on Impermanent Loss?
How Does the Fee Structure in Concentrated Liquidity Pools Compensate for the Increased Risk of Impermanent Loss?

Glossar