Does the PoA Model Fully Eliminate the ‘Nothing-at-Stake’ Problem?

PoA significantly mitigates the 'nothing-at-stake' problem but may not fully eliminate it. The initial PoW phase ensures a real-world cost for creating the block template, which is the primary deterrent.

However, the subsequent PoS validation phase still involves stakers signing the block. While the combination is stronger, a sophisticated attack involving coordinated PoW mining and PoS signing could still pose a risk, though it is highly impractical.

What Is the ‘Nothing-at-Stake’ Problem That PoA Aims to Address?
What Is the Precise Economic Cost Incurred by a PoW Miner in the “Nothing at Stake” Scenario for PoA?
What Is the Theoretical Attack Vector Remaining in PoA?
What Are the Main Criticisms of the PoA Model?
How Does the Staker Selection Process in PoA Enhance Security?
How Does Residual Consensus Risk Affect the Hedging Cost for Derivatives Issuers?
What Is the Concept of “Nothing at Stake” and How Does PoS Attempt to Solve It?
How Is the ‘Nothing-at-Stake’ Problem Addressed in Modern PoS Protocols?

Glossar