How Are Standardized Derivatives like Exchange-Traded Options Designed for CLOB Compatibility?

Exchange-traded options are designed for CLOB compatibility through extreme standardization of their key terms. Exchanges predefine the underlying asset, the contract size (e.g.

100 shares), the expiration dates (e.g. the third Friday of the month), and the strike prices (e.g. in increments of $5). By fixing these variables, the exchange makes the options fungible.

This allows thousands of traders to post bids and offers on a specific option contract (e.g. a $150 call expiring in December), creating the concentrated liquidity needed for a CLOB to function efficiently.

How Does a Hard Fork or Soft Fork Change the Block Size Limit?
What Are the Key Differences between a ‘Hard Fork’ and a ‘Soft Fork’ in Blockchain Development?
What Is the Concept of a “Soft Fork” versus a “Hard Fork” in Blockchain Upgrades?
What Is the Difference between a Soft Fork and a Hard Fork in Relation to Block Size Changes?
How Do Other Blockchains Achieve EVM Compatibility?
How Does a Hard Fork Differ from a Soft Fork in Terms of Network Consensus?
What Is a Hard Fork versus a Soft Fork in Cryptocurrency?
How Do Clearing Houses Mitigate Systemic Risk in Standardized Derivatives Trading?

Glossar