How Can a Decentralized Sequencer Model Be Implemented to Mitigate MEV on L2?

A decentralized sequencer model can be implemented using a set of rotating sequencers selected through a consensus mechanism like Proof-of-Stake or a similar verifiable random function. This rotation prevents any single entity from perpetually controlling the transaction order.

Additionally, the sequencers can be required to use fair ordering mechanisms or commit-reveal schemes to ensure transparent and objective transaction sequencing.

How Can a Decentralized Sequencer Prevent MEV in Layer 2 Rollups?
What Is the Role of a ‘Sequencer’ in Layer-2 Solutions That Use Transaction Batching?
What Is a Transaction Sequencer and How Does It Attempt to Solve the Ordering Problem?
Can Layer 2 Scaling Solutions Inherently Reduce the Opportunity for MEV Front-Running?
What Is the Concept of “Fair Ordering” and How Does It Address MEV?
Explain the Difference between MEV in Proof-of-Work (PoW) and Proof-of-Stake (PoS) Consensus Mechanisms
What Is the Concept of a “Fair Ordering” Mechanism in Blockchain?
Does a Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) Running a DEX Need to Implement Fair Access Protocols?

Glossar