How Can a Low Number of Core Developers Expose a Protocol to Security Vulnerabilities?

A low number of core developers increases the risk of security vulnerabilities because there are fewer eyes reviewing the code, fewer resources for timely bug fixes, and a higher chance of critical knowledge being concentrated in one or two individuals. This lack of diverse, continuous scrutiny can lead to unaddressed exploits or slow responses to zero-day vulnerabilities, significantly increasing the risk of a smart contract exploit and subsequent loss of funds.

How Is a Smart Contract “Audited”?
What Is the Risk of a Bug in a Smart Contract Compared to a Clause in a Traditional Contract?
What Is the Difference between a Bug Bounty Program and a Security Audit?
Why Is a High Degree of Centralization Often Necessary during a Project’s Bootstrap Phase?
What Happens If There Is a Bug or Exploit in a Smart Contract’s Code?
How Are Smart Contracts Audited to Identify and Mitigate Security Risks?
What Is the Role of Bug Bounties in Improving Smart Contract Security?
What Is the Purpose of a Smart Contract ‘Audit’?

Glossar