How Can Cryptocurrency Exchanges Protect Themselves from Attacks on Low-Difficulty Coins?

Exchanges can implement higher confirmation requirements for deposits of low-difficulty coins, particularly against 51% attacks. They should monitor the network's hash rate and look for sudden, suspicious spikes.

Implementing a time-lock on withdrawals after a deposit can mitigate double-spending risks. They may also delist coins that pose an unacceptable security risk due to extremely low difficulty or centralization.

Strong internal security protocols are also essential.

How Do Centralized Exchanges Typically Protect Themselves from Double-Spend Attacks?
Does Key Distribution Increase the Latency of Asset Withdrawal?
What Is the Role of a “Hash Time Lock Contract” (HTLC) in Atomic Swaps?
What Role Does Hash Rate Monitoring Play in Exchange Security?
What Is the Role of Cryptocurrency Exchanges in Protecting against 51% Attacks?
How Do Centralized Exchanges Differ from Decentralized Exchanges in Terms of Security Risks?
How Does the Implied Volatility of an Option on a Low-Hash-Rate Coin Compare to a High-Hash-Rate Coin?
How Does a Higher Confirmation Requirement Mitigate a Double-Spending Attack?

Glossar