How Can Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) Comply with KYC/AML?

DAOs face significant challenges in complying with KYC/AML because they lack a central legal entity or responsible party. Compliance is often attempted through "front-end" measures, such as requiring KYC checks on the initial token sale or through centralized interfaces that interact with the protocol.

However, the decentralized core of the protocol remains difficult to regulate. Regulators are still debating how to assign legal liability and enforce compliance within fully decentralized structures.

How Do DAOs Fit into the Regulatory Framework for Financial Derivatives?
What Is the Role of “Decentralized Autonomous Organizations” (DAOs) in Preventing Token Concentration?
What Is the Regulatory Challenge Dapps Face Compared to CeFi?
How Do RFQ Platforms Manage the Balance between Anonymity and KYC/AML Compliance?
How Do Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) Handle AML Requirements?
What Are the Limitations of Using Traditional DCF for Early-Stage Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs)?
How Does the Lack of a Central Intermediary in a DEX Complicate the Enforcement of Anti-Front-Running Rules?
How Does the Lack of a Central Entity Complicate the Enforcement of Anti-Front-Running Measures in DeFi?

Glossar