How Can Dispute Resolution Mechanisms Be Embedded within Smart Contracts to Function without Traditional Courts?

Embedded dispute resolution can be achieved by programming the smart contract to defer to a specific resolution process. One method is to designate a trusted, mutually agreed-upon third-party arbiter who is given a special cryptographic key to pause or modify the contract's state.

A more decentralized approach involves integrating with platforms like Kleros or Aragon Court, where a pool of token-holding jurors is randomly selected to vote on a dispute. The contract is programmed to automatically execute the outcome of the jury's decision, releasing funds or assets accordingly.

How Do DAOs Handle Dispute Resolution Compared to the Legal Frameworks Used by Corporations?
What Is a Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) in Dispute Resolution?
How Do Smart Contracts Enforce Compliance during Secondary Trading?
How Does the Immutability of a Smart Contract Affect the Resolution of Disputes in Derivatives Trading?
What Is the Role of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) in Governing and Resolving Disputes Related to Financial Smart Contracts?
How Does Immutability Affect Dispute Resolution in a DeFi Contract?
How Do Decentralized Arbitration Systems Work for Smart Contracts?
How Can Smart Contracts Be Designed to Comply with Evolving Multi-Jurisdictional Regulations?

Glossar