Skip to main content

How Can Path-Dependent Volatility, as Opposed to Simple Price Change, Affect the Actual Realized Impermanent Loss?

Simple price change calculations for impermanent loss only consider the start and end prices. However, path-dependent volatility ▴ the journey the price takes between two points ▴ can significantly impact realized loss.

High volatility along the path generates more trading fees for the liquidity provider. Therefore, a volatile path that ends at the original price ratio could result in a net gain for the LP, while a smooth path to a new price might result in a loss not fully covered by fees.

The actual outcome depends on the fees accrued versus the divergence loss.

What Is “Impermanent Loss” in the Context of AMMs and Liquidity Provision?
How Does a DEX Generate Revenue beyond Transaction Fees?
What Are the Trade-Offs between Earning High Trading Fees in a Volatile Pool versus Minimizing Impermanent Loss in a Stable Pool?
Does a Flash Crash or Sudden Price Spike Lead to Higher or Lower Impermanent Loss than a Gradual Change?