How Do Automated Market Makers (AMMs) Create the Vulnerability for Sandwich Attacks?

AMMs, such as Uniswap, use a constant product formula (x y = k) to determine asset prices and execute trades. When a large trade is executed, it significantly shifts the ratio of assets in the liquidity pool, causing a predictable price change.

This deterministic price impact, combined with the public visibility of the pending transaction in the mempool, creates a clear, exploitable arbitrage opportunity that is the basis for the sandwich attack.

What Is the Key Vulnerability That Sandwich Attacks Exploit on Automated Market Makers (AMMs)?
How Does the ‘Constant Sum’ Formula Differ from the ‘Constant Product’ Formula in AMMs?
Can a ‘Private Transaction Relay’ Prevent a Sandwich Attack?
What Is the Primary Mathematical Formula Used by AMMs to Maintain Pool Balance?
How Does the Constant Product Formula (X Y=k) Ensure Liquidity Is Always Available, Regardless of Trade Size?
What Role Do Automated Market Makers (AMMs) Play in Impermanent Loss?
Explain the Role of the ‘Mempool’ in Enabling Sandwich Attacks
What Are the Advantages and Disadvantages of Using a Constant Sum Formula versus a Constant Product Formula in an AMM?

Glossar