How Do “Checkpointing” Mechanisms Enhance Finality in Some Blockchains?

Checkpointing involves periodically and officially confirming the state of the blockchain at a specific block height. This is often done by a trusted entity or a consensus of a secondary network.

Once a block is checkpointed, it is considered absolutely final and irreversible, even in the event of a chain reorganization attempt. This mechanism provides stronger, more immediate finality than the probabilistic finality of native PoW, making 51% attacks on older, checkpointed blocks impossible.

How Does “Checkpointing” or “Social Consensus” Mitigate the Long-Range Attack Risk in PoS?
What Is the Primary Difference between a ‘View’ Function and a ‘State-Changing’ Function?
What Is the Difference between “Confirmation Time” and “Finality” in a Blockchain Transaction?
Explain the ‘Trusted Setup’ Requirement for Some zk-SNARK Implementations
What Is the Difference between “Probabilistic Finality” and “Absolute Finality” in Blockchains?
What Are the Trade-Offs of Implementing Centralized Checkpointing in a Decentralized Network?
How Does the “Finality” Concept in Other Blockchains Differ from Bitcoin’s Confirmation Process?
What Is ‘Transaction Finality’ and How Does It Differ across Various Blockchain Architectures?

Glossar