How Do DAOs Prevent Hostile Takeovers by Large Token Holders?

DAOs employ several mechanisms to prevent hostile takeovers. One common method is to require a quorum, a minimum percentage of total tokens that must participate for a vote to be valid, preventing a small group from passing proposals.

Another strategy is time-locking, which introduces a delay between when a proposal is passed and when it is executed, allowing the community time to react. Some DAOs also use quadratic voting, where the cost to cast additional votes increases, reducing the power of large holders.

Finally, distributing tokens widely during the initial launch helps decentralize power from the start.

What Is the Role of “Decentralized Autonomous Organizations” (DAOs) in Preventing Token Concentration?
How Does Quadratic Voting Specifically Limit the Influence of Large Token Holders in DAOs?
How Do Token Voting Weight Schemes Attempt to Balance Large and Small Holder Influence?
What Are the Trade-Offs of Using Quadratic Voting for Proposal Funding versus Simple Majority Voting?
What Are the Primary Alternatives to Quadratic Voting for Fair DAO Governance?
What Is the Potential Drawback of Implementing Quadratic Voting in a DeFi Protocol?
How Does a Sybil Attack Pose a Threat to Quadratic Voting Systems?
How Is Quadratic Funding Different from Quadratic Voting?

Glossar