How Do “Fraud Proofs” Work and What Are Their Limitations?

Fraud proofs are a security mechanism that allows network participants to challenge and prove the invalidity of a block. If a validator submits an invalid block, any other participant can submit a fraud proof to the network, which contains evidence of the invalidity.

If the fraud proof is valid, the invalid block is rejected and the validator who submitted it is punished. The main limitation of fraud proofs is that they rely on the assumption that there will always be at least one honest participant who is willing to submit a fraud proof.

If all participants are malicious or apathetic, an invalid block could be accepted by the network.

What Is the Primary Security Assumption for an SPV Client?
How Does ‘Nakamoto Consensus’ Relate to the 51% Attack?
What Is the Primary Difference between Optimistic Rollups and ZK-Rollups?
How Does a “Validity Proof” Differ from a “Fraud Proof” in the Context of Blockchain Finality?
How Does the Assumption of a Lognormal Distribution of Stock Prices Affect the Model’s Accuracy?
Who Are the Main Participants in the CDS Market and What Are Their Roles?
What Is the Difference between an Optimistic Rollup and a ZK-Rollup?
What Is the Difference between a ZK-Rollup and an Optimistic Rollup?

Glossar