How Do Layer 2 Scaling Solutions Attempt to Mitigate High Transaction Fee Variability?

Layer 2 solutions, such as rollups and sidechains, process transactions off the main blockchain (Layer 1) in a batch. This allows the cost of the single Layer 1 transaction to be amortized across hundreds or thousands of Layer 2 transactions.

By reducing the reliance on the highly congested Layer 1, they provide significantly lower and more predictable transaction fees, thus mitigating the extreme variability seen on the base layer.

What Scaling Solutions Aim to Reduce the Impact of Network Congestion on Fees?
Can a Cross-Chain Bridge Be Considered a Financial Derivative?
What Is the Impact of Transaction Batching on Network Throughput and User Fees?
What Is the Difference between an “Optimistic Rollup” and a “ZK-Rollup”?
How Do ‘Layer 2’ Solutions Address PoW Scalability Issues?
How Does a Layer-2 Scaling Solution Address the High Transaction Fee Risk?
How Do Layer 2 Scaling Solutions Address the Throughput Issue?
How Do Layer 2 Scaling Solutions like the Lightning Network Reduce Congestion on the Layer 1 Mempool?

Glossar