How Do Over-Collateralized Stablecoins like MakerDAO’s DAI Attempt to Mitigate Psychological “Bank Run” Risks?

Over-collateralized stablecoins like DAI mitigate bank run risk by backing each dollar of stablecoin with more than a dollar's worth of volatile assets like Ethereum. This collateral is locked in transparent smart contracts.

This system is designed to withstand price shocks because even if the collateral's value drops, there is a buffer. The transparency of the on-chain collateral allows users to verify the backing at any time, fostering trust and reducing the purely psychological panic that can trigger a run on an uncollateralized or under-collateralized asset.

Is a Crypto-Backed Stablecoin More Decentralized than an Algorithmic One?
How Does the Collateralization Mechanism of Stablecoins like DAI Differ from Centralized Ones like USDC?
How Can Circuit Breakers or Trading Halts Mitigate the Psychological Panic Driving a Death Spiral?
What Is the Difference between a ‘Fiat-Backed’ and an ‘Algorithmic’ Stablecoin?
Give an Example of a Prominent Over-Collateralized Stablecoin Protocol
How Does the Concept of “Full Collateralization” Differ between Fiat-Backed and Crypto-Backed Stablecoins?
Provide an Example of a DeFi Composability Failure (E.g. the 2020 MakerDAO Black Thursday)
How Does the “Peg Stability Module” (PSM) Help Maintain DAI’s 1 Dollar Peg?

Glossar