How Do Payment Channels, like the Lightning Network, Circumvent the Need for Zero-Confirmation Security?

Payment channels, such as the Lightning Network (LN), circumvent the need for zero-confirmation security by using pre-signed, unbroadcasted Bitcoin transactions and a penalty mechanism. Funds are locked into a two-party channel, and all subsequent transactions within the channel are instant and trustless because they are secured by the ability to broadcast the most recent valid state to the main chain.

The penalty mechanism (Revocable Sequence Maturity Contract) ensures that any attempt to broadcast an old, invalid state results in the cheater losing their funds.

What Is the Primary Gas-Saving Feature of ERC-1155 Batch Transfers?
How Does a Consensus Mechanism like Proof-of-Authority (PoA) Work in a Private Blockchain?
How Do State Channels Handle Disputes If Participants Disagree on the State of an Off-Chain Derivative Contract?
Is There a Penalty for Not Meeting the Initial Margin?
How Do Layer 2 Solutions like the Lightning Network Address Block Space Limitations?
How Do Decentralized Exchanges (DEXs) Attempt to Circumvent Traditional KYC/AML Requirements?
How Did SegWit Impact the Development of Layer 2 Solutions like the Lightning Network?
How Can Flash Loans Be Used for Arbitrage in DeFi?

Glossar