How Do PoS Systems Mitigate the 51% Attack Risk Differently than PoW?

In a PoS system, a 51% attack requires an attacker to acquire 51% of the total staked cryptocurrency, which is extremely expensive and logistically difficult. More importantly, PoS protocols often have a 'slashing' mechanism.

If a validator attempts a malicious act like a double-spend, their staked collateral is automatically confiscated. This economic deterrent makes the attack unprofitable and highly risky, unlike PoW where the attacker only loses electricity costs.

How Does a 51% Attack Differ between PoW and PoS Systems?
How Do Proof-of-Stake (PoS) Systems Achieve Economic Finality Differently than PoW Systems?
How Does the ‘Economic Security’ of PoS Compare to PoW?
What Is the Concept of ‘Economic Finality’ in PoS and Why Is It Important?
What Is a “Transaction Spam” Attack and How Do Fees Mitigate It?
How Does a DON Mitigate the Risk of a Sybil Attack?
What Is the “51% Attack” and How Does It Differ in PoW versus PoS Systems?
How Does the “51% Attack” Differ between PoW and PoS Systems?

Glossar