Skip to main content

How Do Protocols That Offer Single-Sided Liquidity Provisioning Manage the Risk of Impermanent Loss for Their Users?

Protocols offering single-sided liquidity often use their native token to absorb the impermanent loss risk. When a user deposits a single asset, the protocol pairs it with its own token.

If impermanent loss occurs, the protocol's treasury is used to compensate the user, often through the issuance of more native tokens. This creates a more user-friendly experience but can lead to inflation of the native token and may not be sustainable in the long term, especially during periods of high market volatility.

What Are the Differences between Single-Sided and Dual-Sided Liquidity Provisioning in AMMs?
What Is the Impact of a Deflationary Vs. Inflationary Token Model?
What Is the Difference between an Inflationary and a Deflationary Token Model?
What Is the Difference between a ‘Deflationary’ and an ‘Inflationary’ Token Model?