How Do Single-Asset Staking Pools Differ from Single-Sided Liquidity Pools?

Single-asset staking pools typically involve locking a token to secure a network or governance, earning rewards in the form of the staked token or another governance token. This carries no impermanent loss risk.

Single-sided liquidity pools, however, are a form of AMM provision where the deposited token may be swapped for the other token in the pair to balance the pool, exposing the user to the risk of impermanent loss.

How Do “Burn” Mechanisms or Staking Rewards Affect the Security Analysis?
What Is the Relationship between the Staking Participation Rate and the Network’s Security Budget?
How Does a Staking Mechanism Fundamentally Differ from a Mining Mechanism in Cryptocurrency?
How Do Single-Sided Staking and Concentrated Liquidity Pools Attempt to Mitigate Impermanent Loss?
What Is ‘Staking’ in the Context of Proof-of-Stake?
How Can ‘Staking’ Be Integrated into a Tokenomics Model?
How Do Staking Rewards Contribute to a Token’s Inflation Rate?
What Is a Governance Token and How Does It Differ from a Utility Token?

Glossar