Skip to main content

How Do These Fee Structures Resemble Commission Models in Traditional Finance?

Mining pool fee structures are analogous to commission or fee models in traditional finance. PPS is similar to a fixed commission per transaction or a management fee, where the service provider (pool) guarantees a result for a higher fee.

PPLNS is closer to a performance-based fee or a profit-sharing arrangement, where the fee is lower, but the client (miner) only gets paid when the overall operation (pool) is successful.

Why Does Pay-Per-Last-N-Shares (PPLNS) Often Have Lower Fees than PPS?
How Does a protocol’S Fee-Sharing Mechanism with Stablecoin Holders Impact the Native Token’s Value?
What Is the Difference between the ‘Pay-Per-Share’ (PPS) and ‘Proportional’ (PROP) Reward Systems in Mining Pools?
How Do Pool Fee Structures like PPS and PPLNS Affect Miner Payouts?