How Do These Fee Structures Resemble Commission Models in Traditional Finance?

Mining pool fee structures are analogous to commission or fee models in traditional finance. PPS is similar to a fixed commission per transaction or a management fee, where the service provider (pool) guarantees a result for a higher fee.

PPLNS is closer to a performance-based fee or a profit-sharing arrangement, where the fee is lower, but the client (miner) only gets paid when the overall operation (pool) is successful.

What Are the Different Payout Schemes Used by Mining Pools (E.g. PPLNS, PPS)?
What Is the Difference between the PPS and PPLNS Reward Systems in a Mining Pool?
How Are Payments Structured for Renting Hashrate Compared to a Mining Pool’s PPLNS Scheme?
Why Is PPLNS Often Preferred by Long-Term, Dedicated Miners?
What Is the Difference between a Fee-Sharing Token and a Simple Utility Token in a DCF Context?
What Is the Difference between PPS and PPLNS Mining Pool Reward Systems?
How Does a Bad Luck Streak in PPLNS Differ in Impact from One in PPS?
What Is the Trade-off between Volatility and Expected Return in PPLNS versus PPS?

Glossar