Skip to main content

How Does a 51% Attack Differ from Selfish Mining in Terms of Network Control and Impact?

A 51% attack requires a majority of the hashrate to execute malicious actions like double-spending and censoring transactions. Selfish mining, however, only requires slightly more than 25% of the hashrate and is a revenue-maximizing strategy that doesn't necessarily involve malicious double-spends.

The 51% attack aims to rewrite history, while selfish mining aims to gain a disproportionate share of block rewards. Both exploit proof-of-work but with different objectives and required control.

What Is the Probability of a Successful 51% Attack on a Proof-of-Activity Network Compared to a Pure Proof-of-Work Network?
What Percentage of Hashrate Is Required for Selfish Mining to Be Profitable?
What Is the Difference between Selfish Mining and a 51% Attack?
What Is the Concept of “Selfish Mining” and How Does It Differ from Fee Sniping?