Skip to main content

How Does a Consensus Mechanism like PoA Aim to Prevent Malicious Forks?

PoA prevents malicious forks by making them economically unfeasible and requiring coordination between two distinct groups. An attacker needs to control both the majority of hashing power (PoW) and the majority of staked capital (PoS) to sustain a malicious chain.

The stakers, motivated by their capital investment and potential slashing, are incentivized to sign only the legitimate chain, thus quickly invalidating any malicious fork attempt.

What Is the ‘51% Attack’ Risk in Both PoW and PoS Systems?
How Does PoA’S Reliance on Identity Differ from PoW’s Reliance on Computational Power?
Compare and Contrast the Security Implications of Proof-of-Work (PoW) versus Proof-of-Stake (PoS)
Compare the Capital Cost of a PoS Attack to the Energy Cost of a PoW Attack