How Does a Delayed Block Finality Mechanism Help Defend against Double-Spends?

A delayed block finality mechanism requires a much higher number of confirmations (e.g. 100 or more) before a transaction is considered irreversible or "final." For an attacker to successfully double-spend, they must secretly mine a longer chain that overcomes this high confirmation threshold.

This significantly increases the cost and time required for the attack, making it economically unviable for most small-scale attackers. It forces exchanges to wait longer before crediting deposits.

What Is Transaction Confirmation Time and Why Is It Crucial for Preventing Double-Spends?
What Is the Minimum Number of Confirmations an Attacker Needs to Overcome?
How Does a Higher Confirmation Requirement Mitigate a Double-Spending Attack?
Why Does the Number of Required Confirmations Increase with Transaction Value?
How Can a Blockchain Network Defend against a 51% Attack?
How Does Transaction Finality Relate to the Number of Block Confirmations?
How Many Confirmations Are Typically Considered Sufficient for Transaction Finality?
How Does Increasing the Confirmation Count Mitigate a Double-Spending Attack?

Glossar