How Does a Large Team Allocation Affect Investor Perception?

A large team allocation (e.g. over 20-25% of total supply) can negatively affect investor perception, as it may suggest a high risk of future sell-offs that could depress the token price. It can also be perceived as the team prioritizing self-enrichment over community benefit.

Investors prefer moderate allocations with long, transparent vesting schedules to signal long-term commitment and alignment.

How Does a project’S’roadmap’Help Investors Evaluate the Team’s Execution Risk?
How Do Vesting Schedules for Team Tokens Compare to Those for Early Investors?
How Does the Release of Vested Tokens Affect the Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV)?
How Does a High Team Allocation Ratio Affect Market Perception?
What Is the Legal Principle of ‘Unjust Enrichment’ in a Crypto Context?
What Is a Token Vesting Schedule and How Does It Relate to Preventing a Sudden Sell-Off?
Why Is an Anonymous Development Team a Major Red Flag for Investors?
What Is the Concept of “Skin in the Game” for a Development Team?

Glossar