How Does a Liquid Staking Derivative Impact PoS Governance?

Liquid staking derivatives (LSDs) allow users to maintain liquidity while their underlying assets are staked. By holding the LSD, users may gain voting rights, or these rights may be centralized with the LSD provider.

This introduces a potential centralization risk where a few large LSD protocols could gain outsized influence over governance decisions. It separates the economic interest from direct participation.

What Is the Concept of “Liquid Democracy” or “Delegated Voting” in DAOs?
What Is the Systemic Risk If One LSD Provider Controls a Majority of a PoS Network’s Stake?
How Does the DPoS Model Attempt to Solve the Low Participation Problem in Governance?
How Does the Concept of “Delegated Voting” Impact the Valuation of a Governance Token?
How Does a ‘Delegated Voting’ System Work in a DAO?
How Does ‘Liquid Staking’ Derivatives Impact the Capital Efficiency of Staked Cryptocurrency?
How Do Derivative Protocols Handle the Underlying Asset’s Governance Rights?
What Governance Model Is Required for a Liquid Staking Protocol Itself?

Glossar