How Does a Network’s Decentralization Level Affect Its Resistance to a 51% Attack?

A highly decentralized network, where the hash rate is distributed among many independent miners across various geographic and political jurisdictions, is far more resistant to a 51% attack. Centralization, such as a few mining pools controlling a majority of the hash rate, makes the network vulnerable.

In a decentralized system, coordinating 51% of the hash power would require collusion among a vast number of independent actors, which is practically impossible.

What Is a “51% Attack” and Why Is Hash Rate Relevant to It?
How Does the Number of Independent Nodes Relate to the Oracle’s Resistance to a 51% Attack?
In the Context of Options Trading, How Is the Relationship between Share Difficulty and Network Difficulty Analogous to “In-the-Money” Vs. “Out-of-the-Money”?
How Does Decentralized Mining Mitigate the Risk of a 51% Attack?
What Is the “Nakamoto Coefficient” as a Measure of Decentralization?
How Does a “Governance Attack” Differ from a 51% Attack?
Why Is It Practically Impossible to Be Perfectly ‘Gamma-Neutral’ at All Times?
How Does the Cost of Internet Bandwidth Affect Mining Decentralization?

Glossar