How Does a Non-Turing-Complete Language Enhance the Security of Smart Contracts?

A non-Turing-complete language enhances security by simplifying the code and limiting its capabilities. By disallowing complex operations like loops and recursion, the language makes the behavior of smart contracts more predictable and easier to analyze.

This reduces the attack surface for potential vulnerabilities and makes it significantly easier to audit the code for errors or malicious logic before deployment. The absence of these complex structures effectively eliminates entire classes of bugs, such as infinite loops that could drain resources.

How Does the Auditing Process for a Smart Contract on Bitcoin Differ from One on Ethereum?
What Specific Types of Vulnerabilities Are Common in Turing-Complete Smart Contracts but Absent in Non-Turing-Complete Ones?
What Does ‘Turing-Complete’ Mean in the Context of the EVM?
What Programming Languages Are Best Suited for Writing Secure Financial Smart Contracts?
Is It Possible to Build Complex Financial Derivatives on a Non-Turing-Complete Blockchain?
What Are the Key Differences between Bitcoin’S Script and Ethereum’s Solidity?
What Programming Languages Are Commonly Used to Write Rebase Token Smart Contracts?
How Does the Choice of Programming Language Influence the Gas Costs of a Transaction?