How Does a PoS System Recover from a Situation Where Finality Is Not Achieved?

If the network fails to achieve the two-thirds supermajority required for finality, the chain enters a "non-finalizing" state. Ethereum uses an "inactivity leak" mechanism to recover.

This mechanism gradually reduces the stake of validators who are offline or not attesting. This process eventually causes the non-participating validators to fall below the two-thirds threshold, allowing the remaining, honest, and active validators to regain the supermajority and resume finalization.

How Does “Slashing” in PoS Incentivize Good Behavior from Validators?
How Does “Slashing” Mitigate the “Nothing at Stake” Problem?
What Is the Role of a “Supermajority” in PoS Finality?
What Is the Difference between ‘Slashing’ and ‘Inactivity Leak’?
How Does a PoS Re-Org Affect Staking Rewards for Honest Validators?
How Does Transaction Finality Work in a pBFT-based System?
Explain the Concept of “Economic Finality” in a PoS Blockchain
What Is an “Inactivity Leak” and How Does It Differ from a Full Slash?

Glossar