How Does a ‘Protocol-to-Protocol’ Lending Agreement Differ from Holding a Third-Party Token?

A protocol-to-protocol (P2P) lending agreement involves one protocol depositing assets into another's lending pool, often for a negotiated, fixed rate. This is a direct financial relationship with specific terms.

Holding a third-party token is a passive investment, exposing the treasury to the full market and governance risk of the token. P2P lending is typically a lower-risk, more structured way to earn yield.

Can a Peer-to-Peer Protocol Be Used for Tokenized Options Trading?
What Is the Difference between a VASP and a P2P Transaction under the Travel Rule?
What Is the Legal Risk If a “Utility Token” Is Never Actually Used for Its Stated Utility?
What Is the Relationship between Open Interest and Funding Rate Magnitude during Volatility?
How Does an Atomic Swap Differ from Using a Centralized Crypto Bridge Service?
What Are the Risks Associated with Using a Third-Party Liquidity Locker Service?
How Can Financial Derivatives like Futures or Options Be Structured Using Bitcoin’s Limited Scripting Capabilities?
How Does a DAO’s Governance Model Respond to a Real-Time Security Exploit of Its Financial Contracts?

Glossar