How Does a Protocol’s Fee Structure Influence the Profitability of an LP Facing Impermanent Loss?

The protocol's fee structure directly determines the LP's income, which is the primary offset for impermanent loss. Higher transaction fees (e.g.

0.3% vs. 0.05%) lead to greater fee income for the LP for the same trading volume, making it more likely that the LP's net position (fees minus IL) will be profitable.

Conversely, very low fees require extremely high trading volume to break even. Some protocols also implement dynamic fees that adjust based on volatility, attempting to compensate LPs more during periods of high impermanent loss.

How Does the Fee Tier (E.g. 0.3% Vs 0.05%) of a Pool Affect the Net Profitability against IL?
How Are Capital Losses Treated and Limited against Ordinary Income?
How Does a Low Volume-to-Liquidity Ratio Affect the Profitability of an LP?
How Do AMMs with Dynamic Fees Adjust to Mitigate the Impact of Arbitrage on Liquidity Providers?
How Does the Fee Structure in Concentrated Liquidity Pools Compensate for the Increased Risk of Impermanent Loss?
How Can High Trading Fees Fully Offset a Moderate Impermanent Loss?
How Do You Forecast Future Protocol Revenue for a Crypto Project?
How Do Promotional 0% Fee Periods Impact the Pool Operator’s Short-Term Profitability?

Glossar